Back in the office after yet another incredibly inspiring
Planningness, thanks to the tireless efforts of
Mark and
Claire, as well as the
long list of fantastic and truly brilliant speakers. Though I think they learned their lesson by
asking me to speak last time, and wisely chose not to this time around (kidding…I think). Anyway, lots of people with very different backgrounds and different views on the world shared their ideas with us, and the breakout sessions were again intense yet
wonderfully productive at the same time. Many of these folks, in planningness tradition, were from far outside the ad world, and it made it all the more interesting and fun. And of course, there was plenty of drinks with
old and new friends (
more and more and the list goes…) once the sessions let out, and I think even 3 days later I’m still feeling the effects.
A few people have already written up recaps/implications worth checking out (including
Ed Cottons excellent post which he seemingly posted hours after the final session while the rest of us were still knocking back a few). Given I’ve been lucky enough to go to all 3 planningness events so far, I thought I’d also try and share some things I’ve learned overall, not just this past session, and also some thoughts as we look toward the next time we all get together.
The idealism from Planningness 1 has been replaced, to some degree, with practicality
You could probably read that and take it as a bad thing, that maybe we’ve become disheartened or less enthused, but I think that couldn’t be further from the truth. When I left the first Planningness, I felt like
I was walking on air. It was the first conference of it’s kind I had ever been to (which I think is true for most of us), and I got back to the office determined to change the world in 7 days or less. Well, not surprisingly, that didn’t happen. And it
frustrated the hell out of me.
Ed and
Kristina keenly pointed out this feeling of high vs low at the start of their session:
By the second planningness, and getting the chance to speak, I was back on the horse, though I distinctly remember forcing myself to realize the types of changes and shifts in thinking we were all talking about takes time. And by our latest gathering, I think a more practical atmosphere may be starting to define the conference- each time we’ll come away better armed and ready to make changes than when we arrive, but it’s still not going to happen overnight. It’s tough, it will be frustrating, but I think that challenge is in part what will continue to drive us forward. And the more we can push each other forward, the more likely success will be.
On that note, perhaps there’s some therapeutic value in the dreaded echo chamberIn a few of the sessions, we aired out in our groups some of the major problems planners face today, from our roles not being fully understood by clients, to our value in helping actually come up with creative ideas not being understood internally, to resource and time constraints on the brief/briefing process, and everything in between. And I guess to some that could be seen as a bit of an echo chamber, planners running in circles talking to each other. While I agree there are many detrimental aspects of the ‘echo chamber’ as it’s often referred to— particularly that it can perpetuate the stereotype of talkers vs doers— maybe the therapeutic side is one unspoken benefit. It helps for me to know there are others out there struggling through the same things, beyond these walls. Dealing with the same challenges, having the same fights, losing the same battles. It’s not in defense of an echo chamber, but just a point to say maybe there’s one helpful aspect to it after all.
Frankly, there are too many brilliant people in this industry for agencies to fail
Just a few lines after I said idealism has been replaced with practicality, I realize maybe this is an idealistic thought. But working with all of the people in attendance this year, witnessing brilliance and energy in action, and seeing how determined (and perhaps even a little desperate) we all are to bring about meaningful change to this industry convinces me that for all the talk of the death of agencies, there’s simply too much talent for us all to fail. This isn’t limited to planners, of course, and I don’t think anyone else in attendance would believe that it is. We all know there are people across our own offices of a similar mind, determined to push things forward, whether you work at a large network agency or a small boutique. My hope is the more we’re able to learn from each other, gain fresh ideas and approaches, we can continue to make progress. It might be slower than most of us would like, but as
someone once said, “change doesn’t happen over night”.
Something to think about for Planningness 4: maybe we should invite more creatives
On that note, I might submit this humbly to our amazing organizers- what if we all looked around at our respective agencies to get some creatives out to the next Planningness? They may not be interested or may not care, but I bet there are a few that would. And I wonder if it would impact their views on what planning is perhaps seen as today vs what it can and should be, to see first hand how determined and excited we all are about the possibilities for the future, particularly when you put so many in one room and get outside the day-to-day challenges of work. Not that we want to fundamentally change the spirit and culture of Planningness, but just as
Adrian sought to bring together the worlds of production and strategy in his session, maybe we can continue to blend other worlds into our little family.
All that said…
What did I miss, and what did you learn? What sticks in other people’s minds? I realize I didn’t get too far into details about specific sessions, would love to hear further thoughts. And I’ll try and post a bit more about things in the coming days. Either way, can’t wait for the next Planningness. Thanks again to Mark and Claire (and everyone else who spoke and attended). See you all soon I hope.
Posted via email from avin narasimhan | Comment »